Hp-pavilion FQ425AA-ABA a6655f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion FQ425AA-ABA a6655f (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA3
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080620
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '16 at 20:54
Run Duration	475 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9150e 947 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 51 32% 45.7 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 99 13% 99.8 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% PNY(196E 104A) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 1.75 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 1.74 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AA0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 92.7 Write 97.2 Mixed 88.8 70% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.17 47% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 63%
SAMSUNG HM500LI 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 465GB free, PID 0470 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	7.25% Terrible	Read 10.8 Write 11.6 Mixed 10.6 14% 11 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.25 44% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.25% Great: 17%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 394GB free, PID 50a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.89% Terrible	Read 12.3 Write 12.2 Mixed 7.41 13% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.89% Great: 48%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,344 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 211GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.16% Terrible	Read 11.8 Write 11.5 Mixed 9.95 14% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.16% Great: 45%
ST380013 A 80GB 39GB free, PID 2506 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.35% Terrible	Read 11.9 Write 11.2 Mixed 9.29 14% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.31 46% 0.6 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion FQ425AA-ABA a6655f

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)