Lenovo 2325MN1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2325MN1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325MN1
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130222
Uptime39.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '18 at 23:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 55
2-Core 152
60% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 214
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 3
4% 4.28 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.3
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 166 155 150 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 290
Write 212
Mixed 206
SusWrite 157
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 16.9
60% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 218
169% 233 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback