bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '18 at 20:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
J1PR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 188
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 584
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800
Nvidia(10DE 0593) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 342.0
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 5.28
10% 8.63 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 6.78
7% 8.44 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 173 103 59 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.8% Good
Read 260
Write 248
Mixed 236
SusWrite 122
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 37.2
122% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 177
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
58GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 173 197 209 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69% Good
Read 259
Write 248
Mixed 228
SusWrite 190
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 37.1
122% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
370GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 173 198 209 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.5% Good
Read 260
Write 249
Mixed 236
SusWrite 190
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 37.6
124% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
158GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 111 113 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 186
Write 158
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 113
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.8
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback