PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q PRO TURBO (all builds) |
Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090804 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 30 '18 at 02:37 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 542 611 609 618 582 MB/s
|
134%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
56GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 136 136 136 135 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
91GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 143 143 143 143 MB/s
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
100GB free
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 49 48 48 MB/s
|
27%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR2
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 18x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 16x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 9x |
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 8x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $501 |