Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170814
Uptime	11 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '18 at 03:27
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 58.1 2-Core 174 54% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 321 43% 320 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.1% Above average	Lighting 63.1 Reflection 61 Parallax 56.7 51% 60.3 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 66.2 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDCR480GB-7-A 480GB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 606ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 82 113 101 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 314 Write 278 Mixed 309 SusWrite 122 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 19.4 67% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 70 DQ Mixed 83.8 74% 115 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 366GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 150 153 151 156 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 166 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 153 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB 547 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.4% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 10.9 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 11.5 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	56x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	34x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16