Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 10:01
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-8500-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.5% Very good
1-Core 119
2-Core 239
84% 179 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 719
74% 583 Pts
64-Core 661
44% 661 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 28.3
5% 22 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 16.4
2% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$138
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 98 96 98 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 417
Write 137
Mixed 125
SusWrite 98.8
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 23.1
79% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 24.8
35% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
329GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 162 157 162 160 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 149
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 115%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
27GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 44 48 48 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 11.3
Write 23.2
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 47.1
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 22.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 1,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,216
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $320Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback