User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemPC Vortex 1600
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '18 at 10:18
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$370
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
SC Int 130
SC Float 138
SC Mixed 131
106% 133 Pts
QC Int 514
QC Float 548
QC Mixed 527
120% 530 Pts
MC Int 988
MC Float 1,122
MC Mixed 1,073
158% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$713
Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 512
Reflection 495
Parallax 588
167% 532 fps
MRender 251
Gravity 491
Splatting 265
149% 336 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 156%
Great: 177%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 273 273 269 266 255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,454
Write 1,458
Mixed 1,144
SusWrite 304
296% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 80.8
273% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 995
736% 969 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 244%
Great: 271%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$90
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 184 112 95 86 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 64.8
Write 164
Mixed 11
SusWrite 122
65% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 110%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 36
Write 172
Mixed 40.5
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
215% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 105%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C16K4 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
73.1% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 144%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback