| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds) |
| Memory | 51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170322 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 06 '18 at 19:11 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
86% 155 Pts
|
63% 502 Pts
|
42% 675 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.9%
Above average
|
50% 72.9 fps
|
58% 68.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 348 262 267 267 257 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
86% 384 MB/s
|
183% 65.8 MB/s
|
269% 360 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 145 146 146 146 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 141 149 149 152 152 MB/s
|
59.9%
Above average
|
72% 98.6 MB/s
|
183% 2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMU32GX4M2A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
66%
Good
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
58% 20.4 GB/s
|
56% 71.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,520 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 1,153x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 177x |
| Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples | 79x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 339x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 233x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $1,222 |