Lenovo 7373BTU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Lenovo 7373BTU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '18 at 18:24
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 34.1 2-Core 68.4 40% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 133 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 16,152 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 3047) 2.5GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2040 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.54 Parallax 0.62 1% 0.63 fps	MRender 0.24 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.26 0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.49% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.CCC SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 56 58 60 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 67.3 Write 67.8 Mixed 39 SusWrite 57.4 42% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82 3,253 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 148GB free Firmware: SB4OC70P SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 38 38 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 41.9 Write 30.5 Mixed 21 SusWrite 36.7 24% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 25%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4.2 4.9 4.8 5.2 5 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Read 13.9 Write 11.9 Mixed 4.1 SusWrite 4.4 10% 8.57 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 6.9 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7373BTU Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7373BTU

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
600 240GBSeagate $215Bench 82%, 3,595 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16