Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 350V5
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateAug 22 '18 at 18:14
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 126
61% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 201
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.951.9.3000
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6.08
Parallax 5.12
5% 5.63 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 6.83
5% 5.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 480GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 171 404 219 389 246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 385
Write 317
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 301
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 19.2
64% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 72.7
56% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 130%
Toshiba MK2546GSX 250GB-$38
71GB free
Firmware: LB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 42 42 43 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 37.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 41.7
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 29%
WD Elements 2TB
292GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 25 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 23.9
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 25.6
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-186.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $81
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback