| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180314 |
| Uptime | 11 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 02 '18 at 17:13 |
| Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.8%
Excellent
|
87% 154 Pts
|
65% 538 Pts
|
42% 678 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.2%
Average
|
39% 49.1 fps
|
49% 59.3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72%
Very good
|
72% 25.2 GB/s
|
65% 22.7 GB/s
|
58% 68.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 476x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 78x |
| Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 76x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 90x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 84x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 74x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $910 |