Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '18 at 20:38
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 43.6 1-Core 30.7 2-Core 39.2 26% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 65.2 8-Core 102 10% 83.6 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.1% Below average	Lighting 20.5 Reflection 27.1 Parallax 106 17% 51.3 fps	MRender 81 Gravity 111 Splatting 97.7 80% 96.6 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 196 184 204 194 184 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 284 Write 255 Mixed 193 SusWrite 193 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 11.6 36% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 50 DQ Mixed 82.8 62% 85 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 49GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 215 129 127 106 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 52 Write 398 Mixed 209 SusWrite 167 48% 207 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 14.9 57% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 87.1 69% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 92%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 511GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 330 375 333 324 313 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 372 Write 415 Mixed 328 SusWrite 336 82% 362 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 19.6 73% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 158 126% 175 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZ F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.2% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 20.6 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $995

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16