Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 05:43
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 166
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 326
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5970 (Crossfire Disabled)
AMD(1002 2042) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 21.3
19% 18.9 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.07
Splatting 16.1
6% 5.88 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 73 98 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 233
Write 216
Mixed 169
SusWrite 82.1
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 32.3
93% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 35.8
32% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
517GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 109 103 95 95 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 128
Write 130
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 99.6
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 84%
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$65
596GB free
Firmware: 01.01V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 99 105 112 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 108
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 77%
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB
63GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB 0443 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $223
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback