Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5450-$89 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 32.2 22% 30.7 Pts	4-Core 28.8 8-Core 24.4 4% 26.6 Pts	64-Core 23.8 2% 23.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: LF1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 74 76 73 75 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.9% Poor	Read 78.5 Write 80.5 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 74.4 18% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 17.9 63% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 47.1 DQ Mixed 27.9 23% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 88%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 27GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 5.8 7 9.1 9.7 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.72% Terrible	Read 25.7 Write 11 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 8 12% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.72% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,304 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 3GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 21.5 Write 17.5 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 17.6 24% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	6.96% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 1.6 6% 2.13 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.5 4% 1.3 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.96% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16