Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170606
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 21:15
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$192
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
78.9% Very good
SC Int 90.3
SC Float 92
SC Mixed 91.7
73% 91.3 Pts
QC Int 355
QC Float 385
QC Mixed 374
84% 372 Pts
MC Int 990
MC Float 1019
MC Mixed 1,012
151% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$713
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (118 fps cap detected)
44.1% Average
Lighting 118
Reflection 118
Parallax 118
36% 118 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 119
Splatting 118
50% 119 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 176%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$78
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 495
Write 484
Mixed 383
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 51.8
179% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$92
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 149 148 150 147 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 14
Write 115
Mixed 35
SusWrite 146
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$28
31GB free
Firmware: 1AA01107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 56
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 54.4
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$66
62GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 81 82 93 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 91
Write 92.7
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 82.4
61% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
32GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 58 60 64 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 57.8
Mixed 36
SusWrite 60.9
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$225
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 34.4
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 29.5
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 121%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 4,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $184

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,413
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $319Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback