Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 05:57
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 265
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 835
77% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 61.1
39% 47.2 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 39.9
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 291 284 296 295 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 467
Mixed 364
SusWrite 306
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 48.6
163% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
87GB free
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 156 144 130 156 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 379
Write 186
Mixed 247
SusWrite 151
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 32.9
120% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 195
156% 223 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
656GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 161 168 167 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 148
Mixed 95.1
SusWrite 164
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
830GB free
Firmware: 0106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 126 123 135 141 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 38
Write 39.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 121
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 104 111 109 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 66.5
Write 108
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 107
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
879GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 34 21 30 79 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 27
Write 36.6
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 36.3
40% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 26.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $979
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback