Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 18:51
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 244
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 748
76% 614 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Asus(1043 8284) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 2.12
5% 6.01 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.48
5% 6.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 639 322 320 320 320 318 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,704
Write 1,354
Mixed 489
SusWrite 373
217% 980 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 51.9
214% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1059
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 779
671% 985 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 204%
Great: 236%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
17GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 106 121 129 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 387
Write 133
Mixed 189
SusWrite 121
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 41
162% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 121
102% 150 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 79%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
139GB free
Firmware: 04.04V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
Read 121
Write 115
Mixed 71
SusWrite 120
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
497GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 99.6
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 96.1
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 123 124 126 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 125
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 26
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback