| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140407 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 19 '18 at 05:59 |
| Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | -1% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 0 GHz, turbo 0 GHz (avg)
|
63.5%
Good
|
61% 104 Pts
|
46% 372 Pts
|
30% 479 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.7%
Above average
|
38% 97.8 fps
|
89% 110 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 404 416 414 446 307 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
100% 445 MB/s
|
170% 58.8 MB/s
|
91% 182 MB/s
|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
33GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 72 76 84 78 MB/s
|
65.3%
Good
|
36% 165 MB/s
|
131% 47.5 MB/s
|
70% 94.8 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
4.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 194 199 200 199 193 MB/s
|
86.9%
Excellent
|
101% 138 MB/s
|
120% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.8%
Above average
|
55% 19.1 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
44% 91.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |