Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120502
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 18:09
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 95.3
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 185
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 463
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 411.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 66.9
51% 66.1 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 55.3
Splatting 52.6
45% 55.7 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 168 128 128 170 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 362
Write 353
Mixed 304
SusWrite 156
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 39.3
130% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 223
170% 229 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
78GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 241 234 188 172 170 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
76.7% Very good
Read 259
Write 248
Mixed 241
SusWrite 200
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 44.1
146% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 186
141% 190 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 115
Write 113
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 87.5
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.5
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $626
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback