Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 14:28
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 236
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 675
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 81.2
52% 71.2 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 55.6
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 154 49 213 304 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 807
Write 544
Mixed 604
SusWrite 217
121% 543 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 50
172% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 533
DQ Mixed 458
361% 498 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 122%
Great: 144%
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB
17GB free
Firmware: G871603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 172 174 152 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 481
Write 172
Mixed 229
SusWrite 162
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 44.8
160% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 171
146% 217 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 87%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
186GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 80 83 87 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 143
Write 147
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 84.2
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
237% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 97%
WD Purple Surveillance 6TB (2017)-$140
300GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 99 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 133
Write 111
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 101
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 99%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
56GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 137 133 135 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 107
Write 110
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 137
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 100%
WD Red 5TB (2014)-$58
354GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 169 170 170 169 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 162
Mixed 106
SusWrite 168
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 98%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
582GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 135
Write 138
Mixed 104
SusWrite 95.4
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 112%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
500GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 145 151 147 139 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 143
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.3
221% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 97%
WD Gold 8TB (256MB Cache 2017)-$189
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 173 166 171 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 139
Write 148
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 170
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.5
314% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89%
Great: 124%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 800e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.9 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 2.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 4.7
7% 6.25 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
5GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 6.8 5.6 5.9 6.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 69.4
Write 6.3
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 5.8
20% 23 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 23%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
246GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 84.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 77.5
99% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 30.7
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $912
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback