Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colori, 3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '18 at 20:21
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 94 1-Core 164 2-Core 327 106% 195 Pts	4-Core 605 8-Core 1,003 98% 804 Pts	64-Core 1,332 82% 1,332 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,261 Write 1,450 Mixed 1,233 363% 1,648 MB/s	4K Read 58.8 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 79.4 271% 96.3 MB/s	DQ Read 978 DQ Write 1,013 DQ Mixed 1,006 754% 999 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 82GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,261 Write 1,424 Mixed 1,250 363% 1,645 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 75.2 262% 95.2 MB/s	DQ Read 967 DQ Write 1095 DQ Mixed 990 757% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 51GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 288 281 282 284 283 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 449 Mixed 388 SusWrite 298 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 64.1 212% 75.8 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 358 270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 465GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 128 127 128 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 125 Write 124 Mixed 77 SusWrite 126 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 69%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 81 82 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 77.7 Write 76.5 Mixed 55 SusWrite 80.5 53% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 96%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 38GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.6 7.6 10 9.7 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 3.8 Mixed 28 SusWrite 9.1 23% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.7 99% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 30%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 9GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 11 9 8.6 8.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 17.2 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 12.1 26% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.8 180% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 18.9 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 20.6 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 59.9 67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	396x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	183x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	105x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	102x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	36x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	31x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 81%, 84,291 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $684

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16