Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4158DZ7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4158DZ7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '18 at 11:53
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5530
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 132
60% 96 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 310
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.55 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 4.43
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ibm-esxs ST3300555SS 300GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BA36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 54 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45% Average
Read 87.2
Write 85.9
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 68.8
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
246% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
317GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 52 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 103
Write 88.9
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 66
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 00DA HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 00EC M391B5673FH0-CH9 00C2 18JSF25672AY-1G1D 00EC M391B5673FH0-CH9 00EC M391B5673EH1-CF8 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback