PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7640 |
Motherboard | MSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121008 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 06 '18 at 12:53 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 77% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 19 20 17 16 MB/s
|
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
64GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 142 142 142 140 140 MB/s
|
69.6%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
233GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 20 20 17 16 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
85GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
|
44.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 69x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 26x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 9x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $627 |