Foxconn D270S/D250S/D255/D255-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 6% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Foxconn D270S/D250S/D255/D255-S (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120817
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '16 at 05:40
Run Duration	1519 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	78%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D2700-$96 250 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Memory 26.3 1-Core 7.7 2-Core 9.2 12% 14.4 Pts	4-Core 13.2 8-Core 13.2 2% 13.2 Pts	64-Core 18.9 1% 18.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(105B 0D7C) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1064 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.56 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 39 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3900 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2084 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1976 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2073 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 58 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2025 (C2) HDA temperature 111 101 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.5% Above average	Read 100 Write 100 Mixed 65.3 66% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.26 68% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 69%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 28GB free, PID 8816 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Read 1.98 Write 2.21 Mixed 2.42 3% 2.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.12 10% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 19%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.91% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 3.77 Mixed 6.58 9% 9.17 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.007 10% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.91% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-011.A01L 1x2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	9.4% Terrible	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.43 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.23 GB/s	Latency 278 14% 278 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.4% Great: 13%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Foxconn D270S/D250S/D255/D255-S

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)