Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '18 at 18:10
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 218 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 788 76% 624 Pts	64-Core 1,053 65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36F8) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.03% Terrible	Lighting 3.37 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 3.84 3% 3.54 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 3.53 Splatting 5.35 4% 4.25 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.03% Great: 4%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 56,417 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1B83) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.70 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.9% Below average	Lighting 46.3 Reflection 46.8 Parallax 41.8 38% 45 fps	MRender 45.2 Gravity 42.8 Splatting 50.3 38% 46.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 250GB 2,741 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 58 50 53 53 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 422 Write 321 Mixed 282 SusWrite 82.3 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 44.2 142% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 67.6 122% 241 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 126%
Corsair Force 240GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 180GB free Firmware: 1.3. SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 130 127 126 125 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.7% Above average	Read 131 Write 185 Mixed 157 SusWrite 126 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 79.7 4K Mixed 27 114% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 77.2 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 106 90% 127 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 101%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 78 77 76 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 71 Write 63.3 Mixed 53 SusWrite 76.8 49% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 183GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 66 67 67 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 62 Write 61.8 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 66.4 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560 34,441 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	64% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 20.9 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 16.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	397x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	183x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	105x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	102x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	36x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	31x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 81%, 84,291 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $684

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16