Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 78 2-Core 136 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 219 30% 220 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21D3) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 295 326 325 317 307 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 359 Write 297 Mixed 280 SusWrite 313 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 20.5 72% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 97.4 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 141 113% 154 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 88%
Asmt 2115 500GB 793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 368GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 17.5 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 18.5 16% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB 9,135 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 16.1 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16