Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 148 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 296 40% 296 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8485) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Lighting 34.7 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 40.2 28% 35.4 fps	MRender 43.3 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 35.7 33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 49 88 50 50 50 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 222 Write 217 Mixed 204 SusWrite 75.9 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 29.5 97% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.4 DQ Write 80 DQ Mixed 42.2 36% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 360GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 145 149 151 151 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 126 Write 126 Mixed 68.1 SusWrite 147 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $230

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16