Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-HD2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '18 at 22:23
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	44% Average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 37.7 2-Core 84.9 38% 60.6 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 164 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Asus(1043 0464) CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.11.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 47.8 32% 41.1 fps	MRender 31.1 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 40 29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 10 8.6 19 5.1 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.4% Very poor	Read 217 Write 47.1 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 26 19% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 5.2 32% 7.93 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 193 194 192 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 148 Mixed 88.1 SusWrite 193 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 593GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 109 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 118 Write 129 Mixed 79.4 SusWrite 110 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 STK4U2400D17081C 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.4% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	36x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	23x
Ryzen 3 1300XAMD $102Bench 65%, 38,959 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	18x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	6x
2666 C16 Series 2x4GBUnknownBench 77%, 3,759 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16