Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '18 at 02:29
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 114 2-Core 221 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 695 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 892 55% 892 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3753) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.2% Average	Lighting 54.4 Reflection 62.8 Parallax 51 44% 56.1 fps	MRender 77.8 Gravity 54.4 Splatting 71 56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1881 Write 1,029 Mixed 466 246% 1,126 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 42.2 159% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 381 DQ Mixed 256 200% 267 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 582GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 16 14 11 13 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.47% Terrible	Read 15 Write 25 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 14.5 12% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 8.47% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 200GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 73 74 72 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 55.7 Write 58.5 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 72.4 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 893GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 114 116 115 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 108 Write 110 Mixed 59 SusWrite 114 71% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 293GB free Firmware: JEDOA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 84 85 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 84.5 Write 70.5 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 83.6 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 51%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 751GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 77 78 78 78 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 81 Write 73.7 Mixed 65 SusWrite 76.6 55% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 122 121 120 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	70% Good	Read 124 Write 118 Mixed 72 SusWrite 119 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 F4-2666C15-8GRR TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 F4-2666C15-8GRR 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2134, 2134, 2134, 2134 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.2% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 25.1 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 22.5 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16