Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-VS (all builds)
Memory	0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120910
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '16 at 15:51
Run Duration	483 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 139 59% 97.3 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 190 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 83E1) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.22 2% 1.98 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.13 2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 91 91 3540 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6524 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 21344 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 7 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3177 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 59 403963928 (C2) HDA temperature 69 58 521404447 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 183398 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	35.7% Below average	Read 58.3 Write 66.1 Mixed 34 39% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.41 76% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 62%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50 4,831 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 15GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 12 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 93 92 2370 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2184 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1196 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 90 90 10323 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 973 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1098 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 56 188979806240 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3291 (DF) Load/unload retry count 90 90 10323 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 62182	37.4% Below average	Read 68.2 Write 61.8 Mixed 41 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.24 68% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 47%
Maxtor 6L250M0 251GB-$138 163 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 6GB free Firmware: BACE1GE0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 187 172 24188 (04) Start/Stop count 250 250 6189 (05) Reallocated sector count 251 251 25 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 247 238 33652 (09) Power-on hours count 223 223 41450 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 248 248 2356 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 253 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1817 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 149 49 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 234 234 236 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 170 0	32.9% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 58.9 Mixed 50.2 41% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 3.37 4K Mixed 0.32 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 34%
Seagate ST980812AS 80GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2GB free Firmware: 3.BHD Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 100 121663500 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8590 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 485779972 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6318 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 774 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 35 555810849 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2820 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 366639 (C2) HDA temperature 33 65 68719476769 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 86 54 108344822 (C5) Current pending sector count 98 98 58 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 98 98 58 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	23.6% Poor	Read 42.7 Write 39.4 Mixed 33.7 29% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.25 62% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 23%
Adata Classic C008 USB 2.0 16GB-$9 1,800 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID c08a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.52% Terrible	Read 13.6 Write 3.4 Mixed 4.46 7% 7.17 MB/s	4K Read 3.36 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 0.001 12% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.52% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	62x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	41x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	28x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	54x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	11x

RAM
PSD38G16002 2x8GBPatriotBench 52%, 6,044 samples	10x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	9x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $77

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16