Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H87M-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '18 at 19:45
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4770-$305
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.1% Good
1-Core 108
2-Core 210
75% 159 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 540
58% 452 Pts
64-Core 538
36% 538 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$250
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 233
Reflection 195
Parallax 211
59% 213 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 215
Splatting 167
57% 176 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 484
Write 462
Mixed 371
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 50.4
172% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 228
206% 313 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 117%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$222
493GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 77 75 77 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 83.7
Write 63.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 76.5
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 90%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 32GB
25GB free, PID 4063
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 8.6 8.3 8 8.9 8.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 11.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 8.6
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.1
151% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 16%
Garmin GARMIN Flash 8GB
1GB free, PID 272c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 2.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 0.1
3% 2.33 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.8
171% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Garmin GARMIN Card 32GB
26GB free, PID 272c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Read 2
Write 1.3
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 1.3
2% 1.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.9
44% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $541
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback