Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 00:00
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700-$310
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
SC Int 129
SC Float 136
SC Mixed 131
106% 132 Pts
QC Int 502
QC Float 537
QC Mixed 519
118% 519 Pts
MC Int 972
MC Float 1,122
MC Mixed 1,057
157% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$230
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Lighting 221
Reflection 194
Parallax 208
67% 208 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 209
Splatting 163
75% 174 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$133
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 619 624 612 618 618 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,550
Write 2,339
Mixed 1,412
SusWrite 668
388% 1,742 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 78.8
260% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 882
DQ Mixed 927
698% 934 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 266%
Great: 326%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$96
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 82.5
Write 72.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 83.5
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$182
199GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 145 145 141 149 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 85
SusWrite 146
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
342% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 115%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$184
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 167 169 171 171 171 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 118%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$96
124GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 72 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 71
Write 70.5
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 71.5
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 91%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$165
89GB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 109 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 108
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 26.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 28
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 133%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 146% - Outstanding Total price: $772
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $364Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $75
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $761SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $110SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback