Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '18 at 22:53
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 137 2-Core 274 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 866 86% 699 Pts	64-Core 1043 65% 1043 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% EVGA(3842 6775) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 132 Parallax 128 104% 130 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 126 Splatting 104 88% 108 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 19,561 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 313GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 453 398 255 314 364 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 542 Write 963 Mixed 870 SusWrite 373 156% 687 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 67.3 191% 76.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,020 DQ Write 534 DQ Mixed 541 465% 699 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 170%
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB 2,338 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 66GB free Firmware: 9C08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 307 298 296 295 311 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 303 Mixed 274 SusWrite 302 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 39.9 148% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 200 181% 275 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 98%
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB 2,338 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 77GB free Firmware: 9C08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 309 311 311 296 313 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 312 Mixed 282 SusWrite 306 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 39.5 148% 53 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 201 181% 276 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 98%
WD Red 5TB (2014)-$58 1,098 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 81 81 80 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 98 Write 98.2 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 79.7 65% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 98%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power64G 64GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 37GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 95 90 95 90 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 86.5 Write 50 Mixed 19 SusWrite 91.1 79% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.2 112% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 45%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 1,723 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		4K Read 0.6 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 23GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 31 32 29 34 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 89.2 Write 60 Mixed 59 SusWrite 33.9 76% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 145% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2x8GB 23,800 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21.8 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 26.5 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,932x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	540x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	270x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	479x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	304x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	224x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	154x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,035

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16