Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '19 at 00:54
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4160-$79 48,506 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 95.6 1-Core 102 2-Core 144 71% 114 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 260 35% 259 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	9.46% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 8.94 9% 10.6 fps	MRender 14.6 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 14.5 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.46% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 312 Write 412 Mixed 316 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 53.8 192% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 346 263% 355 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 141GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 100 100 96 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 97.7 Write 97.7 Mixed 64 SusWrite 99.9 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 114%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 11GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 69 68 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 76.7 Write 64.7 Mixed 77 SusWrite 68.4 54% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 340GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 131 132 133 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 116 Mixed 103 SusWrite 131 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 362GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 68 0 0 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 82.2 Write 83.8 Mixed 65 SusWrite 42.2 51% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DCLT8GN128S 2x8GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.2% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.3 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 55.4 72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	49x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	48x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	35x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 61%, 11,630 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16