Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 132% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '19 at 21:59
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% , 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 80.2 1-Core 124 2-Core 249 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 897 84% 698 Pts	64-Core 1,364 84% 1,364 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	154% Outstanding	Lighting 213 Reflection 223 Parallax 210 174% 215 fps	MRender 244 Gravity 211 Splatting 134 154% 196 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 357 430 433 446 443 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 452 Mixed 404 SusWrite 428 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 48 147% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 354 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 477GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 359 431 438 450 446 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 427 Write 445 Mixed 413 SusWrite 430 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 47.3 157% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 357 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 323GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 106 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 91.3 Write 101 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 105 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 175 194 197 201 200 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 191 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 194 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: SPS6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 112 133 134 132 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 145 Write 91.5 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 128 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71% Very good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 22.1 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 11.3 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	38x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	22x
Core i9-7940XIntel $815Bench 83%, 4,560 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	9x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	8x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	5x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $775

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)