Asrock Z77 Professional

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Professional (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '19 at 06:44
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 125 2-Core 237 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 629 65% 526 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Device(1B0A 90F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.1% Average	Lighting 60.9 Reflection 66 Parallax 63.7 50% 63.6 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 58 Splatting 52 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 290 278 260 233 212 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 473 Write 409 Mixed 430 SusWrite 268 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 42.7 138% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 46.5 79% 143 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 128%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 205GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 112 111 110 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 353 Write 333 Mixed 292 SusWrite 111 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 32.8 111% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 97.1 DQ Write 96.3 DQ Mixed 50.9 51% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 184GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 111 111 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 350 Write 337 Mixed 304 SusWrite 111 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 36 116% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 98.4 103% 170 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 124%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 453GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 77 79 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 98.6 Write 98.3 Mixed 60.9 SusWrite 78.1 62% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 88%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 100GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 77 77 75 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 113 Write 112 Mixed 76.4 SusWrite 76.7 70% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 68%
Seagate ST3750840AS 750GB 797 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 150GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 50 50 49 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 13.6 Mixed 27 SusWrite 48.4 24% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 18GB free Firmware: SD04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 63 63 64 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 63.7 Write 7.5 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 63.7 27% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 59%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 58GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 94.9 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 105 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.9 194% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 112%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 39GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 47 47 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 54.5 Write 51.3 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 46.9 35% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 46%
WD WD10EACS-22D6B0 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 171 169 170 171 171 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 168 Write 156 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 169 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 3,072 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 19.3 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 20.3 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Professional Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Professional

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	56x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	36x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	6x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 59%, 3,839 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	5x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16