Asrock Z77 Professional

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Professional  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '19 at 06:44
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3770K-$300
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
SC Int 122
SC Float 125
SC Mixed 123
99% 123 Pts
QC Int 401
QC Float 422
QC Mixed 422
94% 415 Pts
MC Int 630
MC Float 635
MC Mixed 644
95% 636 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$374
Device(1B0A 90F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.4% Good
Lighting 183
Reflection 172
Parallax 204
59% 186 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 174
Splatting 120
63% 147 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$53
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 290 278 260 233 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 473
Write 409
Mixed 430
SusWrite 268
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 42.7
138% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 46.5
79% 143 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 128%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$129
205GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 112 111 110 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 353
Write 333
Mixed 292
SusWrite 111
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 32.8
111% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 97.1
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 50.9
51% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$104
184GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 111 111 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 350
Write 337
Mixed 304
SusWrite 111
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 36
116% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 98.4
103% 170 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 124%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$74
453GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 77 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 98.3
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 78.1
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 91%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
100GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 77 77 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 76.7
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3750840AS 750GB
150GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 50 50 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 41.7
Write 13.6
Mixed 27
SusWrite 48.4
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$50
18GB free
Firmware: SD04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 63 63 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 7.5
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 63.7
27% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 60%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$113
58GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 94.9
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 105
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 111%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$34
39GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 51.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 46.9
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 47%
WD WD10EACS-22D6B0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 171 169 170 171 171 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 168
Write 156
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 169
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 95%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 19.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Z77 Professional Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $884
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback