Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '19 at 07:02
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 89.3 1-Core 138 2-Core 274 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 855 80% 668 Pts	64-Core 1,083 67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB; GV-N1070WF2OC-8GD CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 114 Parallax 96.4 88% 106 fps	MRender 97.2 Gravity 100 Splatting 101 82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB 3,058 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 299GB free (System drive) Firmware: 001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 1222 658 736 941 486 615 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 2,255 Write 1,497 Mixed 1,294 SusWrite 776 324% 1,456 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 83.6 267% 90.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,100 DQ Write 831 DQ Mixed 940 710% 957 MB/s
Poor: 165% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 302%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 12GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 83 104 106 121 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 92.7 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 101 55% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 964GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 109 111 111 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 117 Write 88.5 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 111 69% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 12,409 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.2% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.2 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	169x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	158x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	186x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16