Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	15.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170605
Uptime	7.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '19 at 14:43
Run Duration	346 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 115 2-Core 230 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 756 73% 601 Pts	64-Core 1,138 70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 142 Parallax 134 105% 135 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 132 Splatting 107 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 252GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 683 701 608 566 528 494 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,852 Write 1715 Mixed 689 SusWrite 597 270% 1,213 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 95.1 4K Mixed 50.2 167% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 39.1 DQ Write 683 DQ Mixed 55.4 134% 259 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 302%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 168GB free Firmware: X35510RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 254 267 271 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 266 Write 415 Mixed 277 SusWrite 238 68% 299 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 10.9 96% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 64.8 102% 197 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 173GB free Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 413 420 425 420 424 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 397 Write 403 Mixed 220 SusWrite 415 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 31.6 120% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 113 115% 185 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 133 132 128 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 171 Write 129 Mixed 83 SusWrite 124 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 0739 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 141 141 140 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 135 Write 105 Mixed 73 SusWrite 139 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 19GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 135 132 156 122 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 154 Write 101 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 133 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 103 102 100 97 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 106 Write 103 Mixed 25 SusWrite 99 60% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 190% 2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 87%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 86 87 89 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 203 Write 161 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 87.6 168% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 60%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 760GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 107 113 113 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 112 Write 103 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 109 129% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 117% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EARS-22MVWB0 2TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 520GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 85 79 86 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 91.7 Write 93.8 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 83.3 115% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 54%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B1 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 25GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.6 4.9 6.2 0.9 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 68.2 Write 68.5 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 4.3 64% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB 4,792 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.1% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 23.2 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 20.9 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)