Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 15:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 121
58% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 241
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 36.5
26% 32.2 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 32.1
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 12OGB 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 219 214 221 154 94 MB/s
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.1% Average
Read 242
Write 219
Mixed 206
SusWrite 176
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 15.8
81% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 17.8
26% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 78%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 3.1 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4
6% 6.07 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 7%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 750GB
252GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 25.9
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 24.6
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback