Asus G750JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G750JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JM
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 10:17
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 186
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 460
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Asus(1043 157D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1735
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 20.4
19% 20.5 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 23
Splatting 17.3
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 458 460 460 276 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 473
Mixed 432
SusWrite 392
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 49.8
166% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
885GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.6 5.1 5.1 15 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Read 5
Write 4.3
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 8.2
8% 5.95 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 17%
WD Elements 1TB
121GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 26 26 44 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 16.5
Write 32.5
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 33.1
37% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.1
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JM Builds (Compare 473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $499
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback