| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 15 '19 at 17:34 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 65% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.8%
Average
|
50% 83.3 Pts
|
21% 158 Pts
|
11% 173 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 858D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.3%
Poor
|
23% 27 fps
|
23% 28.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
665GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 113 124 122 142 MB/s
|
75.8%
Very good
|
91% 124 MB/s
|
183% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
18% 6.47 GB/s
|
14% 4.93 GB/s
|
36% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,536 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 921x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 373x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 272x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 521x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 340x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 302x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |