Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171228
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '19 at 18:14
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 76.5 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 83% 153 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 923 83% 702 Pts	64-Core 1,765 109% 1,765 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1225 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 34.6 Parallax 46.7 31% 39.8 fps	MRender 30.2 Gravity 32.5 Splatting 39.6 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 204 217 218 210 212 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 480 Write 440 Mixed 277 SusWrite 216 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 32.6 122% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 255 211% 304 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 101%
Seagate ST3750630AS 750GB-$207 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 572GB free Firmware: LC11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 100 102 102 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 54 SusWrite 101 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 256GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 124 123 112 18 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 153 Write 127 Mixed 106 SusWrite 103 91% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 76%
Inateck ASM1153E 1TB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 928GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 200 200 202 200 201 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 13.6 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 10.2 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $940

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16