PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20130803 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 15 '19 at 20:14 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
59.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
|
3.33%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 76 72 66 77 MB/s
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
112GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 100 96 94 89 91 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 134 162 146 165 171 MB/s
|
64.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 171x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 137x |
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 87x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 71x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 62x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $142 |