Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170616
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 06:15
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 801
73% 615 Pts
64-Core 1134
70% 1134 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1445 MHz, MLim: 2300 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 74.8
28% 51.3 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 31.2
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 937 658 651 660 658 619 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,512
Write 2,196
Mixed 1,458
SusWrite 697
382% 1,716 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 82.9
271% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 923
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 823
619% 831 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 265%
Great: 340%
SABRENT 64GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 222
Write 76.7
Mixed 40.5
24% 113 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 21.9
66% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 98.1
DQ Write 27.1
DQ Mixed 30
31% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 50%
General UDisk 134GB
89GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 4.7 1 2.1 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 1.7
Mixed 12
SusWrite 3.1
9% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
8% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GTZR Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ F4-3000C15-8GTZR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $856
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback