Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3-605 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G3-605
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '19 at 08:11
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 69.1 1-Core 82.1 2-Core 199 64% 117 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 564 58% 466 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 12FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.8% Below average	Lighting 51.4 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 10.6 42% 21.2 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 4.96 18% 25.5 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 62 58 57 57 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 436 Write 200 Mixed 115 SusWrite 61.2 44% 203 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 30.4 123% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 192 154% 224 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 88GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 52 53 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 17.3 Write 90 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 54.7 41% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.9% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 15.1 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 16.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	499x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	456x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	165x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	141x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	129x

SSD
IT LMT-256L9M 256GBLiteonBench 85%, 561 samples	80x
IT LMT-128L9M 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 1,236 samples	64x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x

RAM
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	101x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 7,869 samples	87x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 3,905 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $135

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16