PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A1 |
Memory | 109.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130920 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 21 '19 at 10:15 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
64%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$164
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 435 359 376 349 331 MB/s
|
86.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
167GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 238 236 239 239 233 MB/s
|
58%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WDS2 00T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 102 101 101 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s
|
48%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 9x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples | 5x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |