Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150811
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '19 at 12:42
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3240-$51 10,752 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 87.8 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 178 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 170 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PwrHis(1787 D580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 67.2 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 84.9 55% 73.5 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 69.3 Splatting 56.6 52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 265 283 285 271 302 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 426 Write 312 Mixed 234 SusWrite 276 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 23.6 93% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 81.9 DQ Mixed 132 111% 167 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 32GB free Firmware: ML6OA180 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 76 70 82 66 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 34.3 Write 75.9 Mixed 45.4 SusWrite 72.7 42% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 58GB free Firmware: ML6OA180 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 124 126 128 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 122 Write 118 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 125 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 254GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 76 77 79 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 75.2 Write 80 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 76.3 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 57%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 41GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 82 82 84 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 77.7 Write 76.9 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 81.5 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 138GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 178 179 179 180 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 150 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 176 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 113%
ipTIME External 1TB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 104GB free, PID 3940 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 72 72 72 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 95.2 Write 96.4 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 71.2 105% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.7 236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 46%
Generic USB Flash Disk 4GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 0054 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.8 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 3.7 6% 5.57 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H81M-D2V Builds (Compare 984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V - $84

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	108x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	102x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	68x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	66x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	63x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	35x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $306

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16