Asus M3N72-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M3N72-D  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081209
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateJan 23 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 940
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 41.6
2-Core 86
46% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 155
22% 159 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2763) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 37.1
26% 32.6 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 32.9
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 174 180 185 186 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 221
Write 186
Mixed 185
SusWrite 179
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 38
123% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 52.7
43% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 134%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
46GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 46 48 49 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 85.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 47.8
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
17GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 48 49 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 78
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 47.6
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 36 39 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 35
Write 36.2
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 37.1
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3N72-D Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N72-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback