Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 15:16
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 166
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 523
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.3% Below average
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 38
Parallax 35.5
27% 35.7 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 74.5
42% 47.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 344
Mixed 308
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 37.3
133% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 389
293% 399 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
136GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 181 180 179 178 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 470
Write 429
Mixed 353
SusWrite 209
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 32.1
114% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 200
184% 280 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81%
Great: 97%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 387 384 402 392 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 361
Mixed 355
SusWrite 382
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 34.8
113% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 297
231% 318 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 125%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
58GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 100 100 103 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 98
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 98.8
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 119 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 190
Write 150
Mixed 87
SusWrite 118
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 169 169 171 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 129
Mixed 73
SusWrite 169
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GC3000C15K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 1,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $461
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback