Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 154%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive399% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '19 at 17:19
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-9900X-$920
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
1-Core 126
2-Core 253
89% 189 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 979
92% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,705
114% 1,705 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980 Ti-$480
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79% Very good
Lighting 315
Reflection 291
Parallax 347
83% 318 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 294
Splatting 186
74% 226 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$275
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2269 2265 2265 2289 2290 2278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
399% Outstanding
Read 2,669
Write 2,368
Mixed 1,645
SusWrite 2276
503% 2,240 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 92.9
330% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 1070
DQ Mixed 1,154
868% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 399%
Great: 406%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$275
846GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 495 496 495 496 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 496
Mixed 459
SusWrite 495
111% 492 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 66.3
228% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 138%
Great: 135%
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 240GB-$600
223GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 126 134 156 122 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 314
Write 210
Mixed 201
SusWrite 132
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 35
140% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 159
142% 215 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$105
3TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 185 180 185 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 169
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 182
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
395% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
636GB free
Firmware: 20.04F20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 107
Write 99.6
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 103
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 26.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 165%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 1,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,366
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback